<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video in video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/</link>
	<description>If technology doesn&#039;t seem like magic, it&#039;s probably obsolete.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:37:19 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fluffy Links - Friday 28th November 2008</title>
		<link>http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/comment-page-1/#comment-5606</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fluffy Links - Friday 28th November 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/#comment-5606</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Jonathan is this video of video in video: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Jonathan is this video of video in video: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/comment-page-1/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark - thanks for stopping by. I can see the logic definitely. I think it depends on what the host content is. All forms of advertising are increasingly up against it, as well as paid-for (shock, horror - it&#039;s not free?) premium content - so the more innovation in the area the better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark &#8211; thanks for stopping by. I can see the logic definitely. I think it depends on what the host content is. All forms of advertising are increasingly up against it, as well as paid-for (shock, horror &#8211; it&#8217;s not free?) premium content &#8211; so the more innovation in the area the better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/comment-page-1/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middledigit.net/2008/11/27/video-in-video/#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>I work with a company which does the same thing. Obviously advertisers are very interested given people are skipping the ads with the likes of Sky+ these days...embedding ads in programmes is clearly attractive. People&#039;s first reaction is generally negative, of course, but then when you talk about potentially getting premium content for free (that might otherwise be pay-per-view) by opting into embedded ads, it becomes more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with a company which does the same thing. Obviously advertisers are very interested given people are skipping the ads with the likes of Sky+ these days&#8230;embedding ads in programmes is clearly attractive. People&#8217;s first reaction is generally negative, of course, but then when you talk about potentially getting premium content for free (that might otherwise be pay-per-view) by opting into embedded ads, it becomes more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
